Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Materials

Fortifying Combustion-Powered Soft Robots With 3-D Printing

Materials: Printable polymers with a range of elastic properties make for more rugged robot rompers

by Matt Davenport
July 9, 2015 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 93, Issue 28

ROBO HOP
Credit: Harvard Microrobotics Laboratory
Watch how the robot’s 3-D printed body helps it launch and survive landing.


Making robots that are soft yet durable is a tough task. But engineers must attain that goal if they want to send inexpensive machines into environments such as disaster sites that may be inaccessible or dangerous to humans. Researchers at the Harvard University Microrobotics Laboratory have now made leaps toward that goal, with the help of three-dimensional printing.

[+]Enlarge
Credit: Science
Sequence shows the soft robot’s jumping ability. The robot is about 12 inches in diameter.
A jumping soft robot.
Credit: Science
Sequence shows the soft robot’s jumping ability. The robot is about 12 inches in diameter.

Led by Nicholas W. Bartlett and Michael T. Tolley, the Harvard team created robust, jumping robots using multiple materials with widely varying elastic properties (Science 2015, DOI: 10.1126/science.aab0129). To improve the robots’ ability to endure the stresses and strains of locomotion, the team used nine printable polymer resins to build robot bodies that feature a flexible base, a rigid cap, and materials that span the elasticity gap in between.

To push the robots to their stress and strain limits, the team decided to make them repeatedly launch into the air, Bartlett says. To do so, the roughly hemispherical robots spark a mixture of butane and oxygen in a small internal cavity and pop into the air as their flexible bases expand as a result of the small explosion. The robots can tilt themselves before the jump to guide their horizontal trajectories.

The rubberlike base absorbs the shock of the robots’ landings. Even though a robotic body made entirely of flexible material could work best for absorbing shock, support for the robots’ rigid components would be lacking, such for as gas cylinders, circuit boards, and power supplies, Bartlett points out.

To compare robot body materials, the team examined robots printed entirely with a rigid thermoplastic. Rigid robots jumped the highest of any examined—more than 1 meter high—but were the quickest to fail, the team reports. One shattered after just five trials. Robots with bodies printed with a range of mixed elastic and rigid materials hit a maximum jump height of 0.76 meters and could survive more than 100 jumps, Bartlett says.

Although the team applied its multimaterial strategy to jumping robots, “it could benefit pretty much any mobile, untethered soft robot,” Bartlett tells C&EN. His confidence is bolstered by how common this scheme is in nature. “Think about octopus beaks,” Bartlett says, which are hard and connected to squishy cephalopod bodies with tissues of middling elasticity. “Or even our own bodies, where tendons connect muscle to bone.”

This approach puts researchers “one step closer to making truly biomimetic machines,” says Wendelin Jan Stark of ETH Zurich. Stark was not involved with the Harvard project, but his Functional Materials Laboratory is also researching soft jumping robots powered by combustion (Soft Rob. 2015, DOI: 10.1089/soro.2014.0021).

Stark says the new robots are versatile but describes their current performance as modest. He believes they will improve rapidly now that the Harvard team has demonstrated that 3-D printing can be used to make them. With an increased focus on developing more soft materials, he says, chemists and chemical engineers will build even better robots.

One obstacle is the high cost of 3-D printers capable of putting down multiple materials, but Bartlett doesn’t foresee that standing in the way for long. “Three-dimensional printing is getting bigger by the day,” he says.


This article has been translated into Spanish by Divulgame.org and can be found here.


Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.